The Bodywork Factor

As I have watched others complete vision therapy successfully, I have wondered what I am missing. One of the things I have done to facilitate whole body healing for myself is bodywork, specifically structural integration. (See the end of this post where I mention some other modalities that seem to be working for vision healing.)

So, what is bodywork? I’m not talking about car repair here!  I originally thought that bodywork was a term reserved for the structural integration that provided the cure for my pronounced feet problems. But bodywork actually includes a whole range of energy work and other physical bodywork modalities.

Wikipedia says: “Bodywork is a term used in alternative medicine to describe any therapeutic or personal development technique that involves working with the human body in a form involving manipulative therapy, breath work, or energy medicine. In addition bodywork techniques aim to assess or improve posture, promote awareness of the “body-mind connection” rather than the “mind-body connection,,” or to manipulate the so-called  “energy field” surrounding the human body and affecting health.” Wikipedia goes on to list various non-touch forms of bodywork: reiki, yoga, pranayama, breathwork respiration techniques, therapeutic touch, Bates method for sight training, qigong, and t’ai chi. Forms of manipulative bodywork include: the Alexander technique, applied kinesiology, Bowen technique, chiropractic, Feldenkrais method, hakomi, postural integration, reflexology, Rolfing, shiatsu, structural integration, somatic experiencing, Trager approach, polarity therapy and re-balancing.

The article also mentions that “deep tissue massage therapy and the terms massage and bodywork are often used interchangeably.”

Over the years, I actually had an aversion to many of the types of “body work.” They seemed a little too “woo-woo” or “out there” for me. However a few years ago probably around the same time I first did structural integration, a friend of mine did training in Reiki. She was looking for her niche and exploring lots of hobbies and activities.

The Reiki phase didn’t last long, but she told me after our session, that she hadn’t felt that much energy from anyone before. (Of course her experience was quite limited). I felt like it was productive and positive healing. But I didn’t seek out more treatment.

I have tried the traditional and non-traditional or holistic/naturopathic approach and I believe both have a place. However, I have often received more bang for my buck (in time and energy as well as money) with the non-traditional approach.

I am convinced there is a connection between body and eye alignment. I haven’t been able to find the article again, but I came across something that made the connection between crossed eyes and crossed feet. This is very personal for me because I was born with pigeon toes. When I was an infant, the doctor put me in casts to correct my feet. After the treatment, the doctor said that even though my feet still turned in slightly, I would correct the rest myself. I recall entering a building with windowed doors with my parents when I was about five years old and noticing my feet weren’t straight. I must have asked my mom about it and she told me what the doctor had said. I made a conscious effort after that to point my feet straight.

When I was in high school, foot pain led me to seek help from a podiatrist who prescribed orthodics, which I would apparently always need. X-rays showed that every bone in each of my feet was in the wrong place. The podiatrist said it could be corrected with surgery, but there was no guarantee of success. Imagine them trying to move each of the 52 bones in my feet!

ImageAs a result, I wore orthodics for the next 28 years. Then I discovered bodywork and had the full 12-week session of visits with Ruth Young Bodyworks. After my structural integration practitioner, Ruth, worked on my feet, my extremely high arches were lowered to normal, the hump on the top of each foot was gone, and I threw away my orthodics. They no longer fit my feet anyway! And my feet felt great! Ruth also taught me some exercises to do to keep my feet well. My whole body was aligned properly at last.

There are probably people out there who will say this is an impossible result, including my podiatrists (one who retired and one who I never returned to visit). I am not an isolated case, however. My oldest daughter experienced the same result. She went through foot braces and corrective shoes as an infant, wore orthodics from the time she was 5, and tossed them after structural integration in high school. IT WORKS!

Other approaches:

I recently discovered a blog where they used a combination of energy kinesiology, chiropractic and vision therapy to treat their adopted 2-year-old daughter’s strabismus. (offkltr.com is the website: http://offkltr.com/?s=vision+therapy&x=-1038&y=-374).  Apparently she hasn’t updated in the past year, but it sounded like a rather novel, whole body approach to healing.

I also came across a man who healed his strabismus through the Alexander technique combined with the Eyebody method by Peter Grunwald. (http://see-movement.blogspot.com/2011/07/strabismus-part-one.html).

Advertisements

21 Day Vision Challenge

Back in mid-January I decided I wanted to start a new program for vision improvement. It’s from the “Renewing your vision” chapter in a book entitled The Power Behind Your Eyes: Improving Your Eyesight with Integrated Vision Therapy, by Robert-Michael Kaplan. 51xw-IUNcGL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_SX285_SY380_CR,0,0,285,380_SH20_OU01_It’s the kind of thing that occurs when I make new year’s resolutions and get a little carried away!

The Guidelines for the Twenty-One-Day Program are as follows:

• Obtain a weaker 20/40 prescription (I have been doing this for a couple of years now).

• Wear your lenses only during life-threatening situations. (This is very difficult because I can’t really see to do much of anything without lenses.)

• Eliminate all red meat and dairy products from your diet. ( I was already almost there. Just had to cut out the occasional sour cream and ice cream.)

• Use no added sugar or foods with sugar. (Sugar is everywhere, so this was also very difficult.) • Use no white-flour products. (No big problem.)

• Consume no alcohol or bottled or canned prepared drinks. (No problem.) • Use no cigarettes, tobacco, recreational drugs, caffeine drinks, or unnecessary medications. (also easy.)

• Wear a patch each day for twenty-one days for a maximum of four hours per day. (This one I interpreted to the current recommendations of my behavioral optometrist who told me to wear a bi-nasal patch. So I did that every day with occasional patching of my dominant eye.)

• Watch no late-night television (No problem.)

• Do not read for pleasure (novels, magazines) or do crossword puzzles. (This was tougher because I love to read. So I decided that all the reading had to be for information about vision therapy or health. That means I still did a fair amount of reading, but I justified it for the cause!)

• Take up singing, drawing, painting, sculpting, or writing. (I took up quilt piecing. It has become so addictive that one class wasn’t enough, I limited myself to two classes though–each once a month with two quilt blocks assigned for each class.)

•Play vision games each day. (Already committed to doing this!) • Eat grains, vegetables, legumes, and other healthy foods enriched with sea vegetables such as kelp, kombu, wakame, arame and hijiki. (OK, I must admit I didn’t get on board with the sea vegetables, but the rest of the eating plan was reasonable for me.)

• Keep a daily diary. (For this I started another program called Transform your Life through Handwriting by Vimala Rodgers. I probably didn’t keep adequate track of everything I should be doing as I journaled, but at least I wrote something every day. It’s a 40-day program.  I actually kept this up until March 30.)

• Exercise or move your body for at least fifteen minutes each day. (I figured that on the days I don’t do my 20 minutes of yoga, I do at least 15 minutes of housework.)

As if all of these guidelines weren’t challenge enough, I decided to combine this program with a diet program called The Virgin Diet by JJ Virgin. Basically you cut out the seven most problematic foods: gluten, eggs, sugar and artificial sweeteners, soy, corn, dairy and peanuts. I figured that since I was already on board with the dietary guidelines in the 21-day program, I might as well take it a step or two further. My biggest challenge is sugar, which is cut on either plan. The initial program for The Virgin Diet was also 21 days, so it seemed like the perfect compliment.

In actuality, it was pretty difficult, mostly in the diet area. It didn’t help that we celebrated 3 birthdays during that 21-day period. Finally on the evening of day 20, I had cake and ice cream with my family. I felt better  physically while I was on the program, but since my goal was to improve my vision, and I didn’t experience a great breakthrough, it was hard to stick to it. I’m not sure what kind of improvement would have enticed me to continue–maybe some degree of stereopsis? So, I returned to my regular, mostly-healthy diet and my regular vision therapy program.

Last month, I did a little experiment with taking really good eye-health supplement and a multi-vitamin, which improved how my eyes felt but was pretty expensive. (I’m noticing the difference without them though.) Next on the docket is a combination approach, something that I feel I can really follow long term.

The E.Y.E. unit (i.e. Eyeport Vision Training System)

This week my doc let me borrow a high-tech gadget for vision training called the E.Y.E unit. It was produced by The Sharper Image a few years ago and is the same item that Dr. Jacob Liberman sells on his http://www.exerciseyoureyes.com website for $239.95. It is patented and available through various other distributors as well, including Bernell, who sells VT products to developmental optometrists.

The manual was missing so I went online and found it on Dr. Liberman’s website. There is a plan for 12 weeks of exercises, which take less than ten minutes a day. I’m thinking that could be part of my regular regimen. A study done by the Pacific University College of Optometry was reported in the Journal of the American Optometric Association where it was found to effect small improvement in college students with normal vision. (http://www.optometryjaoa.com/article/S1529-1839(06)00485-4/abstract)  That was October 2006 and they indicated that studies were underway to determine its effectiveness in “symptomatic populations.” That would be me. I found another report that same year in the Journal for Behavioral Optometry that indicated improvement in function for police recruits. (http://www.oepf.org/journal/pdf/jbo-volume-17-issue-4-use-eyeport-vision-training-system-enhance-visual-performance-poli).

I found no follow-up studies specific to my situation, but it’s also available through the Optometric Extension Program Foundation (http://www.oepf.org/products/category/vision-therapy?page=2). I figure that if it were going to be discredited, there has been ample time for that.

The website http://www.exerciseyoureyes.com gives a clear definition of the way it works:Image

It’s Really Simple
How the Eyeport Vision Training System works is really quite simple. Your eyes’ focusing muscles flex and relax when they follow the EYEPORT’s programmed series of alternating red and blue lights. Because the lights turn on in different directions, patterns and speeds, your eyes exercise through their full range of motion—horizontally, vertically, diagonally, near, and far. And you don’t even work up a sweat.

Since you often focus at close range while reading or working at a computer, your focusing system becomes stiff and cramped causing computer eye strain. Limbering up your eyes as part of a daily routine will retrain them to work the way they’re supposed to…and you’ll be well on your way to improving your visual performance. All you have to do is commit to a daily 10-minute workout to see results.

And It’s Patented
What makes the EYEPORT unique is its patented use of alternating red and blue lights. This makes it possible to achieve dramatic results, faster and more efficiently than with any other vision exercise product available today.

“Using the EYEPORT is like opening up a new world. My eyes feel stronger, more active and more alert. There’s more to see and interact with. It makes me a more efficient athlete and has made me more comfortable and relaxed in a broad range of activities. I was amazed at the way it changed my life.”Rick Chetnever, Kula, HI

Basically, your eyes react differently to red and blue lights due to a scientific phenomenon called chromatic aberration. The focusing system contracts when it sees red and relaxes looking at blue. By combining eye exercises with specific colored lights, the EYEPORT strengthens your vision skills in a revolutionary new way never previously done. And it’s easy.

I admit it is pretty easy and quick. I did a little more today than the prescribed amount, testing out the various program settings. Now that I have the training schedule, I’ll be more focused in my efforts! Stay tuned for the update!

Another reason to see a 3D movie

I read a post Monday on the blog “Wide-Eyed Wonder: An artist’s musings on three-dimensional vision” where Lynda Rimke shares her experience seeing a 3D movie while still in vision therapy (http://leavingflatland.wordpress.com/2013/01/21/life-of-3-1415926535-8979323846-2643383279-etc/). Leaving the movie theatre, she actually experienced “float,” or three dimensional effects in real life. I was intrigued, and wondered if that would be possible for me. So at Tuesday’s vision therapy appointment I asked Dr. Davies about it. Lynda had recently gotten a new pair of glasses with prisms before this 3D movie experience. I have had some success while using a prism in therapy sessions, so I saw a possible connection. Dr. Davies gave me some stick on prisms for the 3D glasses and encouraged me to try it.

imagesAs luck would have it, the very movie Lynda saw, Life of Pi, is currently showing at our local budget theatre in 3D for only $3.25. It has been years (maybe 10) since I took my kids to a 3D movie, mostly because I can’t see it, so it seemed like a big waste of money. In retrospect, I realize that was a fairly selfish way of looking at the 3D experience. I took four of my children (the ones currently at home) to yesterday’s matinee. Two of them finished vision therapy a few months ago and this was their first 3D movie experience since then. None of them remembered seeing a movie in 3D before.

My ten-year-old daughter was especially enthralled with the special effects. It really was a beautiful movie! I saw the “falling in” effects more than the things popping out and had a headache by the end. But I can see the potential. Things looked a little different when I exited the theatre. Without the prisms, my eyes soon reverted back to their regular way of seeing. And my eyes were really tired! However, I enjoyed the movie and especially appreciated my daughter’s delight at the 3D effects.

I have been wearing a pair of clear glasses (i.e. pink party glasses) that are taped to provide a bi-nasal patch. That way I can wear my contacts and take the glasses off at will. I bought an extra pair when I misplaced the first, so I had the brilliant realization that I could play around with the prisms on my extra pair. I’m thinking driving with prisms isn’t a good idea, but otherwise it gives me a different perspective that may encourage more fusion. Even if the 3D movie didn’t help me (and I’m hopeful it did), at least my children got to enjoy it!

The Talent Code: part 2

I started reading the next book in my pile, so it’s time I finished sharing my practical application of The Talent Code.  First, I’ll share a little more about the first principle, which is deep practice. Then I’ll talk about the other two principles: ignition and master coaching.

I love that it follows closely with how I encourage my students to practice piano. When they do these things, progress is so much greater! The first rule is “chunk it up.” First you absorb the whole thing (i.e. listen to or watch the skill), then break it into chunks and slow it down. Rule two is that you repeat it and rule three is learn to feel it.

This week as I concentrated more on how I could share the principles of talent with my children and piano students, it was amazing to experience how those principles flow naturally into each other.

I spent a great deal of time last week with two of my piano students who were playing together  in a duet festival on Saturday. One was my youngest daughter, Abby, who finished vision therapy a few months ago, and the other was her friend Emily. They are both fifth graders, ages 10 and 11 and have been playing the piano for a few years but not excelling in the way I would hope. Emily had been out of town and was struggling to put the duet together.

I realized that perhaps I had not instilled the principles of deep practice sufficiently well into either of these students. So, we went back to the problem areas and did slow repetition with Emily alone, then with Abby, who had a hard time slowing down. So, Emily did it slowly with me and then with Abby. We worked through all the problem spots and got all the notes together.

“There’s something missing still,” I coached. “It needs emotion. Show what this is really about!” I went to youtube and I pulled up a performance of their piece In the Hall of the Mountain King in it’s original form for orchestra and had them listen. They caught the excitement and enjoyed the accelerating tempo of the performance. Something finally clicked for them both and they played freely with passion. Emily’s mom and I just looked at each other in wonder.

The unintended consequence was that they also started to speed up when it got louder, which was not lost on the judge at the festival Saturday. And they got nervous so they didn’t play out like they had, but we knew what they could do and so do they!

I also took a few minutes in one of last week’s coaching sessions and played a couple of my favorite fun pieces for them, both by Jon Schmidt. This goes along with the principle of IGNITION. Many things can provide ignition, like hearing the orchestra play their duet. I asked what they really wanted to play, even if it was beyond their current capabilities. They both wanted to play music by Jon Schmidt (Waterfall  and All of Me. Here’s the link:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fAZIQ-vpdw). So I played the original versions and shared simplified versions that they could learn. Both girls are so much more excited to play the piano now!

And my almost 13-year-old daughter who gave up piano some time ago overheard me teling Abby and Emily that they could learn whatever they wanted and said “What the heck! You never let me do that!” So now she’s learning Waterfall by rote (i.e. by ear) because I think that may just be the key to her learning the reading skills she needs. (I’m having her follow along with the music as I play it for her.)

The bottom line of this experience is that by providing all three of these principles this week, deep practice, ignition and master coaching, I saw big shifts in these students and renewed confidence in myself as a teacher and master coach.

And can’t you just feel the joy in musical creation when you hear Jon Schmidt play All of Me?

Developing Talented Eyes

I just finished reading a spell-binding book. It was first one in a stack of books I recently requested at my local public library. I have a habit of making such requests in bulk, and then realizing after I get the stack home that there’s no way I will ever read all of them before it’s time to return them. They either get renewed or quickly scanned as I move on to my next topic of interest.

My current passion is talent and genius. My original thought was that I should figure out what I’m missing as I teach my eyes how to work together properly. That usually means a lot of reading online and more books.

I’m not even sure where I came across the list, but I was so moved that I typed it on a sticky note on my computer and requested every book.

The list includes the following:

1. Talent is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else, by Geoff Colvin

Image2. The Talent Code: Greatness Isn’t Born. It’s Grown. Here’s How. by Daniel Coyle

3. Outliers: The Story of Success,  by Malcolm Gladwell (which I know I at least skimmed before)

4. The Genius in All of Us: Why Everything You’ve Been Told About Genetics, Talent, and IQ Is Wrong, by David Shenk

5. Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham, and the Science of Success, by Matthew Syed.

The first in my pile happened to be The Talent Code, which I found so mesmerizing that I finally took a few hours out and finished it. I have been applying the first fundamental all week in my vision therapy and as I have worked with my piano students. Coyle identifies three basic components that are necessary to unlock talent. They are: deep practice, ignition and master coaching.

Deep practice is not an unfamiliar concept, but it’s something I have tended to forget in the routine of doing vision therapy exercises as well as in teaching and learning other concepts. OF COURSE (visualize the head smack that accompanies this), deep practice is key to success. Why would anyone think otherwise? It’s just that it takes so much effort.

I was struck by the example given of a thirteen-year-old girl named Clarissa who demonstrated this principle in her clarinet practice. Coyle calls her the girl who did a month’s worth of practice in six minutes. I looked for the video on youtube and what came up was the trailer for the book. I didn’t find it on Coyle’s thetalentcode.com website either, even though someone had asked about it with no response.

Six minutes is a fairly random number, but I took it to heart. If a child can do it, so can I. So I concentrated on specific exercises for six minutes at a time and timed myself. I did it several times throughout the day. (This is instead of twenty minutes at one time–usually at the end of the day when I’m tired.) The next day I was dizzy. I don’t know if it was because of the concentrated practice or because I was dehydrated, but it felt like a shift anyway.

It’s a  shift I plan to continue to experience as I practice more deeply and apply principles of deep practice to my piano teaching and the quilting classes I’m taking. More on the other principles next time.

What is lazy eye anyway? Some definitions.

One of the most persistent misconceptions I encounter is the idea that everyone who has an eye turn is termed to have a “lazy eye.” The easiest way to explain is to first define a few terms. “Lazy eye” is the lay term for amblyopia which the dictionary defines as “impaired vision with no discernible damage to the eye or optic nerve.” The result of that impaired vision is that the eye is not able to be corrected to 20/20 and the person compensates by using only the other eye. Eye teaming with an impaired eye is usually not worth the trouble and often the person doesn’t know how to use both eyes together anyway. The eye which is not being used turns in and is then considered a “lazy eye.” Opthalmologists treat the condition by patching the weaker eye, which sometimes improves the vision in that eye, but does nothing to help the eyes work together.

My diagnosis is strabismus, which the medical dictionary defines as “a visual defect in which one eye cannot focus with the other on an objective because of imbalance of the eye muscles. Also called heterotropia squinttropia.”  Choosing this definition allows the medical community to focus on correcting the defect with surgery. Successful surgery is defined as a cosmetic fix (no visible turn) but the eyes are still not focusing together, so the strabismus remains. If the patient is lucky enough to have vision therapy in connection with surgery, a cure becomes much more likely. An example of this would be my brother, who had three eye surgeries as a child and now has no eye turn, yet people ask him if he is looking at them. Strabismus can lead to amblyopia if the person uses just the dominant eye.

Nowhere in the standard dictionary definitions is there a real description of the WHY of strabismus. My understanding of why my eyes take turns instead of working together is that it is a compensating mechanism. If I choose to look out of both of my eyes at the same time, I actually experience diplopia, “a visual defect in which a single object is seen in duplicate; double vision. It can be caused by incorrect fixation or by an abnormality in the visual system.”  I mentioned in a previous post that I was creating diplopia, or double vision, by working on my own with the Brock string. Since I don’t want permanent double vision, we are concentrating on peripheral vision and strengthening other visual skills in vision therapy. Suppressing the sight in one eye (often by turning the eye) avoids double vision.

When I look out of my dominant right eye, my left eye now avoids double vision by turning in. If I switch to the left eye, the right turns in (and it’s a larger turn). No, my eyes are not lazy, they just don’t know how to work together yet more than 12 inches from my face. (And the deviation was not always as noticeable as it is now.) I actually can see the 3D effect in the Magic Eye books if I hold them really close to my face, but my doctor discourages that because we are working to extend my range of fusion. The inward turning of the eye is called esoptropia (es-uh-troh-pee-uh) or “strabismus in which one eye deviates inward.” Barbra Streisand is famous example of someone with esotropia. The opposite of this is exotropia or when one eye deviates outward (also called “wall-eye”). A well known person with exotropia is Martha Stewart.

martha-stewart      Barbra Streisand